Mining of Mineral Deposits

ISSN 2415-3443 (Online)

ISSN 2415-3435 (Print)

Flag Counter

Geological framework and metallogenic evolution of the Demirli Cu-Mo porphyry system, Lesser Caucasus, Azerbaijan

Namad Pashayev1, Saida Ibrahimova1, Murad Abdulla-zada1

1Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, Baku, Azerbaijan


Min. miner. depos. 2026, 20(3): 121-133


https://doi.org/10.33271/mining20.03.121

Full text (PDF)


      ABSTRACT

      Purpose. The Demirli Cu-Mo porphyry system, hosted within Jurassic volcanic-volcaniclastic successions and spatially associated with the Janyatag granitoid pluton (Lesser Caucasus, Azerbaijan), represents a key target for reassessing its residual mineral potential using legacy exploration data and results from renewed exploration initiated in 2024.

      Methods. We integrated legacy geological mapping and exploration datasets (1965-1989 and subsequent campaigns) with digitized drilling and sampling archives, 1:1000-scale lithologic-structural mapping covering 1.97 km2, systematic sampling of alteration zones and mine-related materials, reverse-circulation drilling conducted in 2024, and 3D geological modeling using Leapfrog Geo and Micromine. Historical geophysical and geochemical datasets, including magnetic surveys, electrical methods such as induced polarization, and lithochemical data, were used to constrain the subsurface geometry of the mineralized system.

      Findings. Mineralization is concentrated within the apical and marginal domains of a multiphase hypabyssal intrusive complex. It is localized along NW-SE- to near-N-S-trending fault corridors linked to the Gylyataq deep fault system. Hydrothermal alteration comprises extensive silicification (secondary quartzites) and quartz-sericite, quartz-kaolinite, and quartz-chlorite assemblages, accompanied by stockwork veinlets and disseminated sulfides. Surface and mine-related samples commonly yield Cu concentrations of approximately 0.1-0.7%, with locally elevated Mo values. Legacy datasets indicate a vertically extensive mineralized interval of approximately 200-300 m and a broad anomaly footprint consistent with porphyry-style veinlet and disseminated mineralization.

      Originality. The study provides an integrated reinterpretation linking intrusive evolution, structural reactivation, alteration architecture, and 3D geological modeling, thereby refining the exploration model for the Demirli Cu-Mo porphyry system.

      Practical implications. The results support step-out drilling along the principal fault corridors and within apical intrusive and alteration domains, and identify alteration patterns that can serve as exploration vectors in resource-definition programs.

      Keywords: porphyry Cu-Mo; Lesser Caucasus; Lok-Karabakh zone; hypabyssal pluton; induced polarization; hydro-thermal alteration; stockwork; 3D geological modeling


      REFERENCES

  1. Sinclair, W.D. (2007). Porphyry deposits. Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods, 5, 223-243.
  2. Cooke, D.R., Hollings, P., & Walshe, J.L. (2005). Giant porphyry deposits: Characteristics, distribution, and tectonic controls. Economic Geology, 100(5), 801-818. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.100.5.801
  3. Richards, J.P. (2003). Tectono-magmatic precursors for porphyry Cu-(Mo-Au) deposit formation. Economic Geology, 98(8), 1515-1533. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.98.8.1515
  4. Kouzmanov, K., & Pokrovski, G.S. (2012). Hydrothermal controls on metal distribution in porphyry Cu (-Mo-Au) systems. Geology and Genesis of Major Copper Deposits and Districts of the World: A Tribute to Richard H. Sillitoe, 16, 573-618. https://doi.org/10.5382/SP.16.22
  5. Cooke, D.R., Wilkinson, J.J., Baker, M., Agnew, P., Phillips, J., Chang, Z., Chen, H., Wilkinson, C.C., Inglis, S., Hollings, P., Zhang, L., Gemmell, J.B., White, N.C., Danyushevsky, L., & Martin, H. (2020). Using mineral chemistry to aid exploration: A case study from the Resolution porphyry Cu-Mo deposit, Arizona. Economic Geology, 115(4), 813-840. https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.4735
  6. Corbett, G.J. (2002). Structural controls to porphyry Cu-Au and epithermal Au-Ag deposits. Australian Institute of Geoscientists Bulletin, 36, 32-35.
  7. Cannell, J., Cooke, D.R., Walshe, J.L., & Stein, H. (2005). Geology, mineralization, alteration, and structural evolution of the El Teniente porphyry Cu-Mo deposit. Economic Geology, 100(5), 979-1003. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.100.5.979
  8. Keith, J.D., Christiansen, E.H., & Carten, R.B. (1993). The genesis of giant porphyry molybdenum deposits. Giant Ore Deposits, 2, 285-317. https://doi.org/10.5382/SP.02.07
  9. Piquer, J., Sanchez-Alfaro, P., & Pérez-Flores, P. (2021). A new model for the optimal structural context for giant porphyry copper deposit formation. Geology, 49(5), 597-601. https://doi.org/10.1130/G48287.1
  10. Browne, P.R.L. (1978). Hydrothermal alteration in active geothermal fields. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 6, 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.06.050178.001305
  11. Adamia, S., Zakariadze, G., Chkhotua, T., Sadradze, N., Tsereteli, N., Chabukiani, A., & Gventsadze, A. (2011). Geology of the Caucasus: A review. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 20(5), 489-544. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-1005-11
  12. Moritz, R., Melkonyan, R., Selby, D., Popkhadze, N., Gugushvili, V., Tayan, R., & Ramazanov, V. (2016). Metallogeny of the Lesser Caucasus: From arc construction to post-collision evolution. Tectonics and Metallogeny of the Tethyan Orogenic Belt, 19, 157-192. https://doi.org/10.5382/SP.19.06
  13. Pejatović, S. (1971). Doğu Karadeniz-Küçük Kafkasya bölgesindeki metalojenik zonlar ve bunların metalojenik özellikleri. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration, 77, 10-21.
  14. Kangarli, T. (2024). Minerageny of minerals of the south-eastern end of the Lesser Caucasus (Garabagh and East Zangazur, Azerbaijan). Geomining: Systems and Decision-Oriented Perspective, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70725-4_8
  15. Imamverdiev, N.A., Orudzhov, A.I., Valiyev, A.A., & Mursalov, S.S. (2022). Petro-geochemical features of the Bajocian island-arc volcanism in the Lesser Caucasus (Azerbaijan). Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 31(2), 280-292. https://doi.org/10.15421/112226
  16. Aliyeva, E.G., & Guliyev, E.Kh. (2025). Geochemical and mineralogical characteristics of Upper Cretaceous sediments in the Lok-Karabakh zone (Azerbaijan): Implications for provenance, paleoweathering, paleoclimate and reservoir prediction. SOCAR Proceedings, 1, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.5510/OGP20250101036
  17. İsmayıl, C., Arık, F., Özen, Y., & Bayramov, A. (2021). Geochemical, mineralogical and sulfur isotopic evidence on the genesis of the Gadir Au-Ag-Cu-Pb-Zn deposit (NW Azerbaijan), Lesser Caucasus. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(13), 1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07520-6
  18. Babazadeh, V.M., Makhmudov, A.I., & Ramazanov, V.G. (1990). Porphyry copper and molybdenum deposits. Baku, Azerbaijan: Azerbaijan Publication, 377 p.
  19. Chen, Z., Zhang, L., Wan, B., Wu, H., & Cleven, N. (2011). Geochronology and geochemistry of the Wunugetushan porphyry Cu-Mo deposit in NE China and their geological significance. Ore Geology Reviews, 43(1), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2011.08.007
  20. Li, N., Chen, Y.J., Pirajno, F., & Ni, Z.Y. (2013). Timing of the Yuchiling giant porphyry Mo system and implications for ore genesis. Mineralium Deposita, 48(4), 505-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-012-0441-4

Лицензия Creative Commons