Reservoir characteristics of the Miocene age formations at the Allas Dome, Hamrin Anticline, Northern Iraq
Doaa T. Fadhil1, Wafaa Anmar Yonus2, Mustafa A. Theyab1
1University of Samarra, Samarra, 34010, Iraq
2Salahuddin Education Directorate, Tikrit, 34001, Iraq
Min. miner. depos. 2020, 14(4):17-23
https://doi.org/10.33271/mining14.04.017
Full text (PDF)
      ABSTRACT
      Purpose. This study evaluated the reservoir characteristics and determined the formation lithology of Dhiban, Euphrates, and Serikagni in the Hamrin wells (Hr-2 and Hr-9).
      Methods. The well logs have used the gamma ray log, the porosity logs, (density, neutron, and sonic logs), and the resistivity logs. The data were converted into digital values by using the Didger program. The formation lithology was determined on the basis of the density, neutron logs, and gamma ray log.
      Findings. Lithology consists of limestone, dolomite, dolomitic limestone, and marly limestone with the addition of anhydrite. Petrophysical characteristics, namely, volume of shale, porosity, water saturation, and hydrocarbon saturation were calculated and evaluated. The total volume of water and hydrocarbon for reservoir layers were also determined.
      Originality.Dhiban, Euphrates, and Serikagni the formations in the Hamrin field were divided into two potential units, depending on the petrophysical analysis of the well logs in reservoir unit – A(RU-A). Thus, the total thickness of the unit (86.25 m), and average porosity (0.14), the hydrocarbon saturation (0.11), and the volume of shale (14.25). While the Reservoir unit-B (RU-B). The total thickness of the unit (50 m), average porosity (0.09), the hydrocarbon saturation (0.26), and the volume of shale (49).
      Practical implications. The RU-A reservoir unit was characterized by high porosity and high hydrocarbon saturation regardless of the thickness in both wells.
      Keywords: limestone, oil, dolomite, petrophysical, Serikagni, Euphrates, Dhiban
      REFERENCES
- Sissakian, V., Karim, S., Al-Kubaisy, K., Al-Ansari, N., & Knutsson, S. (2016). The Miocene sequence in Iraq, a review and discussion on the stratigraphy, paleogeography and economic potential. Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, 6(3), 271-317.
- Ameen Lawa, F.A., & Ghafur, A.A. (2015). Sequence stratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the prolific late Eocene, Oligocene and early Miocene carbonates from Zagros fold-thrust belt in Kurdistan region. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(10), 8143-8174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1817-4
- Al-Sulaiman, F.A., Al Fahdawi, S.S.A., & Al Qaisy, S.A.S. (2017). Detection of structural control on formation water quality, in Hemrin oilfield, Northern Iraq, using lineament analysis and hydrochemical data. Tikrit Journal of Pure Science, 22(2), 145-158.
- Awadh, S.M., & Al-Owaidi, M.R., (2020). Application of triangles method for quantitative estimation of marl reserve in Euphrates formation, middle of Iraq. Iraqi Geological Journal, 53(2A), 35-49.https://doi.org/10.46717/igj.53.2a.3rw-2020.08.03
- Hussein, D., Collier, R., Lawrence, J.A., Rashid, F., Glover, P.W.J., Lorinczi, P., & Baban, D.H. (2017). Stratigraphic correlation and paleoenvironmental analysis of the hydrocarbon-bearing Early Miocene Euphrates and Jeribe formations in the Zagros folded-thrust belt. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(24), 543.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3342-0
- Mahammed, M.H., & Nasser, M.E. (2018). Facies Analysis and Geological modeling of Euphrates Formation in Ajeel Oil Field, Northern Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Science, 59(4B), 2065-2079.https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2018.59.4b.12
- Jassim, S.Z., & Goff, J.C. (2006). Geology of Iraq. Brno, Czech Republic: Dolin, Prague and Moravian Museum.
- Final geological report of wells Hamrin well-2 (Hr-2). (1976). Iraq: North Oil Company.
- Final geological report of wells Hamrin well-9 (Hr-9). (1982). Iraq: North Oil Company.
- Rider, M. (2002). The geological interpretation of well logs. Aberdeen and Sutherland, United Kingdom: Rider French Consulting Ltd.
- Log interpretation chart. (1988). Huston, United States: Schlumberger Educational Services.
- Log interpretation. Volume I. Principles. (1974). New York, United States: Schlumberger Limited.
- Dresser, A. (1979). Log interpretation charts. Houston, United States: Dresser Industries Inc.
- Selley, R.C. (1998). Elements of petroleum geology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Gulf Professional Publishing.
- George, A., & Charles, G. (1982). Basic well log analysis for geologist. Tulsa, United States: American Association of Petroleum Geologist.
- Asquith, G.B., & Gibso, C.R. (1982). ME 3: Basic well log analysis for geologists. Tulsa, United States: American Association of Petroleum Geologists.https://doi.org/10.1306/99a4d0a3-3318-11d7-8649000102c1865d
- Tiab, D., & Donaldson, E. (2012). Petrophysics, Third edition. Tulsa, United States: Gulf Professional Publishing.
- Log interpretation charts. (1997). Huston, United States: Schlumberger Wireline Testing.
- Archie, G.E. (1950). Introduction to petrophysics of reservoir rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 34(5), 943-961.https://doi.org/10.1306/3d933f62-16b1-11d7-8645000102c1865d
- Log interpretation principles/application. (1989). Huston, United States: Schlumberger Wireline Testing.
- Log interpretation charts. (1987). Huston, United States: Schlumberger Educational Services.
- Alden, J.M., & Stephen, T. (1997). Characterization of petrophysical flow units in carbonate reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin, 81(5), 734-759.https://doi.org/10.1306/522b482f-1727-11d7-8645000102c1865d
- Orodu, O.D., Tang, Z., & Fei, Q. (2009). Hydraulic (flow) unit determination and permeability prediction: A case study of Block Shen-95, Liaohe Oilfield, North-East China. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(10), 1801-1816.https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2009.1801.1816
- Abdi, F., Kamali, M., Aleali, M., & Kadkhodaie, A. (2020). Study of hydraulic flow units using static modeling in upper Surmeh formation (Arab) in one of the Oil Fields, Persian Gulf. Kuwait Journal of Science, 47(1), 103-112.