Mining of Mineral Deposits

ISSN 2415-3443 (Online)

ISSN 2415-3435 (Print)

Flag Counter

Solution of the problem to optimize two-stage allocation of the material flows

Anatolii Bulat1, Serhii Dziuba1, Serhii Minieiev1, Larysa Koriashkina2, Svitlana Us2

1Institute of Geotechnical Mechanics named by N. Poljakov of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Dnipro, 49005, Ukraine

2Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, 49005, Ukraine


Min. miner. depos. 2020, 14(1):27-35


https://doi.org/10.33271/mining14.01.027

Full text (PDF)


      ABSTRACT

      Purpose is to elaborate innovative and computationally efficient algorithm to solve a problem of two-stage allocation of the resource occupying continuously the specified area as well as to demonstrate the behaviour of the corresponding software developed with the application of advanced geoinformation resources.

      Methods. The paper involves mathematical models of continuous problems of optimal set partitioning with additional connections to describe two-stage problems of the material resource location-allocation. Methodological approach to the solution of such problems is based on the idea of their reducing to the problem of infinite-dimensional mathematical programming for which it is possible to obtain optimal solution in the analytical form with the help of the duality theory apparatus.

      Findings. Mathematical and algorithmic apparatus to solve continuous problems applied for the fuel and energy complex enterprises has been developed making it possible to obtain partitioning of the deposit area into the zones, which are alloca-ted to the first-stage enterprises exclusively. The algorithm operation is demonstrated in terms of the model problem solution. It has been defined that the benefit of such an approach is in the reducing of the infinite-dimensional programming problem to the problem of finite-dimensional nonsmoth optimization since the obtained computational formulas contain the parameters which determination requires solving the auxiliary problem of the nondifferentiable function optimization.

      Originality.Contrary to the previously developed one, the proposed algorithm does not stipulate solution of the linear programming problem of transport type at each step of the iteration process. Such a problem is solved only once to find the volumes of product transportation between the first-stage and second-stage enterprises after defining all the optimal solution components.

      Practical implications. Software implementation of the algorithm on the basis of the advanced geoinformation technologies and resources, in terms of the solution of raw material flow allocation, makes it possible to reduce total costs for the management of material flows and their accompanying service flows throughout the whole logistic chain beginning from the flow origin up to its arrival to the end user.

      Keywords: multistage problems, set partitioning, geoinformation technologies, location-allocation, nonsmooth optimization


      REFERENCES

  1. Blyuss, B., Koriashkina, L., Us, S., Minieiev, S., & Dziuba, S. (2019). An optimal two-stage distribution of material flow at the fuel and energy complex enterprises. E3S Web of Conferences, (109), 00008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201910900008
  2. Us, S., & Stanina, O. (2015). On some mathematical models of facility location problems of mining and concentration industry. New Developments in Mining Engineering 2015: Theoretical and Practical Solutions of Mineral Resources Mining, 419-424. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19901-73
  3. Stetsyuk, P.I. (2014). Metody ellipsoidov i r-algoritmy. Kishinev, Moldaviya: Evrika.
  4. Chen, X., Kelley, C.T., Xu, F., & Zhang, Z. (2018). A smoothing direct search method for Monte Carlo-based bound constrained composite nonsmooth optimization. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 40(4), A2174-A2199. https://doi.org/10.1137/17m1116714
  5. Kiseleva, E.M., & Koryashkina, L.S. (2015). Nepreryvnye zadachi optimal’nogo razbieniya mnozhestv i r-algoritmy. Kiev, Ukraina: Naukova dumka.
  6. Us, S.A., Koriashkina, L.S., & Stanina, O.D. (2019). An optimal two-stage allocation of material flows in a transport-logistic system with continuously distributed resource. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, (1), 256-271. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2019-1-24
  7. Antwi, E.K., Krawczynski, R., & Wiegleb, G. (2008). Detecting the effect of disturbance on habitat diversity and land cover change in a post-mining area using GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.03.009
  8. Kalybekov, T., Sandibekov, M., Rysbekov, K., & Zhakypbek, Y. (2019). Substantiation of ways to reclaim the space of the previously mined-out quarries for the recreational purposes. E3S Web of Conferences, (123), 01004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912301004
  9. Malinowska, A., & Hejmanowski, R. (2010). Building damage risk assessment on mining terrains in poland with GIS application. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 47(2), 238-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.09.009
  10. Hussin, N., & Li, W. (2019). Mining the use of geographical information system (GIS) on the cadastral data study. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 8(3), 403-405. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2019/11832019
  11. Usikov, V.I., Lipina, L.N., Alexandrov, A.V., & Korneeva, S.I. (2019). Evaluation of environmental impact of mining waste using GIS technologies. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin, (12), 114-126. https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2019-12-0-114-126
  12. Werner, T.T., Bebbington, A., & Gregory, G. (2019). Assessing impacts of mining: Recent contributions from GIS and remote sensing. Extractive Industries and Society, 6(3), 993-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.06.011
  13. Kaliraj, S., & Malar, V.K. (2012). Geospatial analysis to assess the potential site for coal based thermal power station in Gujarat, India. Advances in Applied Science Research, 3(3), 1554-1562.
  14. Kaundinya, D.P., Balachandra, P., Ravindranath, N.H., & Ashok, V. (2013). A GIS (geographical information system)-based spatial data mining approach for optimal location and capacity planning of distributed biomass power generation facilities: A case study of Tumkur district, India. Energy, (52), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.011
  15. Comber, A., Dickie, J., Jarvis, C., Phillips, M., & Tansey, K. (2015). Locating bioenergy facilities using a modified GIS-based location-allocation-algorithm: Considering the spatial distribution of resource supply. Applied Energy, (154), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.128
  16. Kim, S.-M., Choi, Y., Suh, J., Oh, S., Park, H.D., Yoon, S.H., & Go, W.-R. (2012). ArcMine: A GIS extension to support mine reclamation planning. Computers & Geosciences, (46), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.04.007
  17. Suh, J., Kim, S.-M., Yi, H., & Choi, Y. (2017). An overview of GIS-based modeling and assessment of mining-induced hazards: soil, water, and forest. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121463
  18. Özceylan, E., Uslu, A., Erbaş, M., Çetinkaya, C., & İşleyen, S.K. (2017). Optimizing the location-allocation problem of pharmacy warehouses: A case study in Gaziantep. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications, 7(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.11121/ijocta.01.2017.00373
  19. Khan, M.M.-U.-H., Vaezi, M., & Kumar, A. (2018). Optimal siting of solid waste-to-value-added facilities through a GIS-based assessment. Science of The Total Environment, (610-611), 1065-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.169
  20. Kim, H.Y., & Hwang, J.H. (2018). Combining GIS with AHP for Facility Site Selection: A Case Study in Cheongju, South Korea. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(19), 7933-7939. https://doi.org/10.3923/jeasci.2018.7933.7939
  21. Mineral Resources of Ukraine. (2020). Retrieved from http://eng.minerals-ua.info/
  22. Koriashkina, L.S., Cherevatenko, A.P., & Koriashkina, K.O. (2017). Intehratsiia HIS-tekhnolohii i metodiv rozviazannia neperervnykh zadach optymalnoho multypleksnoho rozbyttia mnozhyn. Systemni Doslidzhennia ta Informatsiini Tekhnolohii, (4), 97-108.
  23. Lewis, A.S., & Overton, M.L. (2012). Nonsmooth optimization via quasi-Newton methods. Mathematical Programming, 141(1-2), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-012-0514-2
  24. Curtis, F.E., & Que, X. (2015). A quasi-Newton algorithm for nonconvex, nonsmooth optimization with global convergence guarantees. Mathematical Programming Computation, 7(4), 399-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-015-0086-2
  25. Audet, C., & Hare, W. (2017). Derivative-free and Blackbox optimization. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68913-5
  26. Hare, W., Sagastizábal, C., & Solodov, M. (2015). A proximal bundle method for nonsmooth nonconvex functions with inexact information. Computational Optimization and Applications, 63(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-015-9762-4

Лицензия Creative Commons

Copyright © 2024 Dnipro University of Technology

Underground Mining Department

All Rights Reserved.

Journal homepage Authors