Determining and determinable factors influencing the size of zone of land-use restriction

Olga Petrakovska¹, Mykola Trehub², Yuliia Trehub², Oleksandr Yankin²

¹Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture Ukraine, Kyiv, 03037, Ukraine

²Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, 49005, Ukraine

Min. miner. depos. 2020, 14(1):107-111

https://doi.org/10.33271/mining14.01.107

Full text (PDF)

      ABSTRACT

      Purpose. Identification and systematization of determining and determinable factors that affect the size of land use re-striction zones to ensure both the legal component of land rights and the well-being of society as a whole.

      Methods. The method of system analysis established the structural relationships between the determining and determinable factors related to forming zones of restrictions on land use and determining their optimal size. Establishing causation between the relevant factors and determination of their impact during the formation of restrictions’ boundaries.

      Findings. The current state legal acts of Ukraine are analyzed, specifying the size of zones associated with different types of land use restrictions. Five groups of factors are identified that affect the spatial characteristics of the restriction zones and are crucial for setting the size of the restriction zone. The division into groups of factors allows a better approach to the further process of determining their impact and provides the basis for appropriate specialists for a comprehensive approach in determining the spatial characteristics of land-use restricted zones. It is determined that taking into account the justified impact of each factor on the overall situation, it is advisable to consider in detail and rank the level of influence within each classification group.

      Originality.For the first time, factors that influence the formation of boundaries of constraints by such classification as determinable and determining factors have been grouped. An appropriate approach was tested for sanitary protection zones.

      Practical implications. Systematized determining and determinable factors can be used to justify the sizes of all types of restrictions, which will further allow the professionals of adjacent branches to carry out easier work on the establishment of boundaries on the terrain of the respective zones and provide their legalization.

      Keywords: land administration, buffer zone, factor, zone of land use restriction, spatial characteristics of the restriction zone

      REFERENCES

1. Ponomariova, A. (2011). Urban renovation of brownfields in Europe. Modern Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning, (26), 155-161.
2. The procedure of maintenance of the State land cadastre (2012). Approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1051-2012-%D0%BF
3. Petlovanyi, M., Kuzmenko, O., Lozynskyi, V., Popovych, V., & Sai, K. (2019). Review of man-made mineral formations accumulation and prospects of their developing in mining industrial regions in Ukraine. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 13(1), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining13.01.024
4. Kostenko, V., Zavialova, O., Chepak, O., & Pokalyuk, V. (2018). Mitigating the adverse environmental impact resulting from closing down of mining enterprises. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 12(3), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.15407/mining12.03.105
5. Filonenko, O. (2018). Sustainable development of Ukrainian iron and steel industry enterprises in regards to the bulk manufacturing waste recycling efficiency improvement. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 12(1), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.15407/mining12.01.115
6. Petrakovska, O., & Trehub, Yu. (2018) Systematization of factors affecting definition of buffer zones. Scientific and Technical Collection Engineering Geodesy, (65), 92-103.
7. Ryabchii, V.A., Ryabchii, V.V., Trehub, M.V., & Trehub, Yu.Ye. (2017). Substantiation of land parcel configuration in buffer zone. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, (4), 80-85.
8. Gorova, A., Pavlychenko, A., Kulyna, S., & Shkremetko, O. (2012). Ecological problems of post-industrial mining areas. Geomechanical Processes During Underground Mining – Proceedings of the School of Underground Mining, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1201/b13157-7
9. Biriuk, S.P. (2013). Urban planning factors and criteria for choosing directions for the reconstruction of industrial areas. Modern Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning, (32), 263-270.
10. Jalal, A., & Fikri, M. (2008). Awareness of noise hazard from construction site. Master’s thesis. Skudai, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering.
11. Torr, P. (2000). Guidelines for separation distances. Washington, United State: Environment Protection Agency.
12. Druzhinin, M.A., & Pleshkanovska, A.M. (2015). Methods of optimization of the territory of sanitary protection zones on the example of the city of Vinnitsa. Modern Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning, (39), 201-205.
13. Mamonov, K.A., & Shternodk, E.S. (2017). Classification of spatial factors that affect the value of land in a metropolis. Utilities of Cities. Series: Technical Sciences and Architecture, (134), 138-142.
14. State sanitary rules for planning and housing of settlements approved by the order of Ministry of Health of Ukraine as of 19.06.1996 No. 173. (1996). Kyiv, Ukraine: Ministry of Health of Ukraine.
15. Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directive 96/82/EC. (2012). Brussels, Belgium: European Union.