Mining of Mineral Deposits

ISSN 2415-3443 (Online)

ISSN 2415-3435 (Print)

Flag Counter

The octahedral concept and cubic triaxiality in assessment of secondary stress state

Mihaela Toderas1

1University of Petrosani, Petrosani, 332006, Romania


Min. miner. depos. 2020, 14(1):81-90


https://doi.org/10.33271/mining14.01.081

Full text (PDF)


      ABSTRACT

      Purpose. The opportunities offered by rock mechanics as a science are not fully and efficiently applied in the design and assessment of underground constructions performed in salt massifs, especially in the efficient design and long-term lifetime of the geometrical elements that characterize the exploitation method with rooms and pillars. It can be asserted that such a conventional limitation of the possibilities of rock mechanics, is due to some gaps, the lack of a fundamental theoretical – experimental theory regarding the three-dimensional behavior of the rock mass.

      Methods. The mechanical behavior of the salt was studied under triaxial conditions. The conventional triaxial method was supplemented with a three-dimensional analysis  –  of salt massif and of rooms and pillars exploitation complex by cubic triaxiality. The deformation behavior of the salt was studied through the assessment of both cylindrical triaxial and cubic triaxial.

      Findings. Analytically, based on the cubic triaxial experiments according to the octahedral concept, deformation and rheological properties of salt, results that a salt massif can be characterized in terms of the natural stress state value, by three types of zones: stable, transition and unstable.

      Originality.Based on the octahedral geomechanical parameters, an analytical model for the characterization of salt massifs has been proposed, a model that has been verified both by laboratory research by the instrumentality of modelling and also by in situ measurements. In this context, it resulted that for the analyzed salt with the highest resistance, the octahedral strength does not exceed 5.6 MPa and, therefore, it is dangerous to use in the salt mines field design values of 2 to 5 times higher than the real value.

      Practical implications. The determination of stress – deformation natural state is related to the highlighting of the contour or limits of the zones situated in a certain state (in triaxial context) with the consideration of the determinative anisotropy, namely, of strength and deformation anisotropy, as well as of the rheological behavior of in situ salt.

      Keywords: octahedral concept, triaxiality, stress state, pillar, salt, rheology, interaction


      REFERENCES

  1. Bérest, P., Ledoux, E., Legait, B., & De Marsily, G. (1979). Effets thermiques dans les cavités en couches salifères. In 4th ISRM Congress, (1), 31-35.
  2. Toderaş, M., Moraru, R., & Danciu, C. (2019). Finite element method applied in mine pressure computatio within the context of rock massif – support system interaction. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 13(1), 39-48.https://doi.org/10.33271/mining13.01.039
  3. Toderas, M., & Danciu, C. (2017). Stability analysis methods of underground mining works. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing, International Publishing House.
  4. Khalymendyk, I., & Baryshnikov, A. (2018). The mechanism of roadway deformation in conditions of laminated rocks. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 17(2), 41-47.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2018.03.004
  5. Shashenko, A., Gapieiev, S., & Solodyankin, A. (2009). Numerical simulation of the elastic-plastic state of rock mass around horizontal workings. Archives of Mining Sciences, 54(2), 341-348.
  6. Hirian, C. (1982). Rock mechanics. Bucharest, Romania: Didactic and Pedagogical Publishing House Bucharest.
  7. Hudson, J., Harrison, J., & Popescu, M. (2002). Engineering Rock Mechanics: An Introduction to the Principles. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 55(2), B30.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1451165
  8. Lunder, P.J. (1994). Hard rock pillar strength estimation an applied empirical approach. M.Sc. Thesis. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia, Faculty of Graduate Studies Department of Mining and Mineral Process Engineering.
  9. Toderaş, M. (2015). Rocks rheology in the stability of underground mining works. Study case: Sedimentary rocks from Jiu Valley, Romania. Saarbrücken, Germany: Scholars’ Press International Publishing House, Lambert Academic Publishing.
  10. Toderas, M., & Moraru, R. (2017). The effect of increasing the water content on rocks characteristics from Şuior, Romania. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 11(3), 1-14.https://doi.org/10.15407/mining11.03.001
  11. Toderaş, M. A., & Todorescu, A. (2003). Possibility of dimensioning the pillars using the principle of interaction in the case of solid exploitation method of salt. AGIR Bulletin, (1), 40-44.
  12. Serata, S. (1968). Application of continuum mechanics to design of deep potash mines in Canada. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 5(4), 293-314.https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(68)90002-8
  13. Todorescu, A. (1982). Rock mechanics in mining. Bucharest, Romania: Technical Publishing House.
  14. Todorescu, A. (1986). Rocks rheology. Bucharest, Romania: Technical Publishing House.
  15. Georgescu, M., Hirian, C., & Toderaş, M. (2005). Dimensioning of the strenght elements (pillar – ceilings) afferent to the +190 m and +190 m levels from Praid salt mine. Environment Friendly Policy in Mining Activities. Proceedings of the First International Seminar Ecominig – Europe in 21st Century, 97-102.
  16. Pariseau, W.G. (2011). Design analysis in rock mechanics (second edition). London, United Kingdom: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.https://doi.org/10.1201/b11461
  17. Yahya, O.M.L., Aubertin, M., & Julien, M.R. (2000). A unified representation of the plasticity, creep and relaxation behavior of rocksalt. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37(5), 787-800.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1365-1609(00)00016-2
  18. Seeger, A. (1958). Kristallplastizität. Handbuch Der Physik / Encyclopedia of Physics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45890-3_1
  19. Todorescu, A., Hirian, C., Gaiducov, V., Arad, V., & Toderaş, M. (1998). Assessment of rheological parameters through in situ measurements in pillars. Research contract Nr.10/1998.
  20. Esterhuizen, G., Dolinar, D., Ellenberger, J. & Prosser, L. (2011). Pillar and roof span design guidelines for underground stone mines. Pittsburgh, United State: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.https://doi.org/10.26616/nioshpub2011171

Лицензия Creative Commons