Mining of Mineral Deposits

ISSN 2415-3443 (Online)

ISSN 2415-3435 (Print)

Flag Counter

Prediction of rock mechanical parameters using gamma ray log data with regression and machine learning approaches

Andyono Broto Santoso1,2, Supandi Sujatono3, Muhammad Alfiza Farhan1, Rizky Syaputra1, Basuki Rahmad2, Barlian Dwinagara2

1Institut Teknologi Sains Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

2Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

3Institut Teknologi Nasional Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia


Min. miner. depos. 2026, 20(2):89-100


https://doi.org/10.33271/mining20.02.089

Full text (PDF)


      ABSTRACT

      Purpose. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using gamma ray (GR) wireline logs as a principal predictor for estimating key rock mechanical parameters, including internal friction angle (φ), cohesion (c), and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), as a rapid and cost-effective alternative to conventional laboratory testing.

      Methods. A dataset of 54 depth-matched records, comprising GR log values and laboratory-derived mechanical properties, was compiled from multiple boreholes in sedimentary formations. Predictive models were developed using linear regression, Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Data preprocessing included median imputation, feature scaling, and an 80/20 train-test split. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to improve model interpretability.

      Findings. Correlation analysis revealed strong positive associations between GR and UCS (r = 0.852), cohesion (r = 0.799), and friction angle (r = 0.785). Among machine learning models, XGBoost delivered the best performance for cohesion (R2 = 0.6764, RMSE = 5.09 kPa) and UCS (R2 = 0.4427, RMSE = 145.42 MPa), while RF was optimal for friction angle (R2 = 0.4955, RMSE = 2.35°). ANN consistently underperformed relative to tree-based models. Linear regression provided competitive baseline performance, indicating a predominantly linear relationship between GR logs and mechanical properties at wireline resolution.

      Originality. This work systematically positions GR logs as the principal predictor of rock mechanical properties – an approach rarely adopted in prior research that predominantly relied on sonic or density logs. The study provides the first systematic empirical comparison of linear and nonlinear models using GR as the primary input feature, establishing practical regression equations directly applicable to field deployment.

      Practical implications. The derived regression equations and validated modeling framework enable engineers to perform rapid geomechanical assessments using widely available GR log data, thereby reducing dependence on costly, time-consuming laboratory testing. This approach is particularly valuable during early exploration stages and in mining contexts where core sample availability is limited.

      Keywords: gamma ray log; rock mechanical parameters; linear regression; machine learning; geomechanics


      REFERENCES

  1. Shahani,, N.M., Ullah, B., Shah, K.S., Hassan, F.U., Ali, R., Elkotb, M.A., Ghoneim, M.E., & Tag-Eldin, E.M. (2022). Predicting angle of internal friction and cohesion of rocks based on machine learning algorithms. Mathematics, 10(20), 3875. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203875
  2. Deniz, B.E., & Topal, T. (2023). Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of the Kızılkaya ignimbrite with variable properties using MRA and ANN, Cappadocia (Turkey). Discover Environment, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-023-00013-1
  3. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1974). Estimating the strength of rock materials. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 74(9), 312-320.
  4. Aladejare, A.E. (2020). Evaluation of empirical estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock using measurements from index and physical tests. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 12, 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.08.001
  5. Aladejare, A.E., Alofe, E.D., Onifade, M., Lawal, A.I., Ozoji, T.M., & Zhang, Z.-X. (2021). Empirical estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock: Database of simple, multiple, and artificial intelligence-based regressions. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 39(6), 4427-4455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01772-5
  6. Madhubabu, T.V., Murthy, Y.R., & Hari Prasad, K. (2016). Prediction of compressive strength and elastic modulus of carbonate rocks. Measurement, 93, 519-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.03.050
  7. Rahman, T., & Sarkar, K. (2021). Lithological control on the estimation of uniaxial compressive strength by the P-wave velocity using supervised and unsupervised learning. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 54(6), 3175-3191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02445-8
  8. Shakoor, A., & Bonelli, R.E. (1991). Relationship between petrographic characteristics, engineering index properties and mechanical properties of selected sandstones. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists, 28(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.xxviii.1.55
  9. Teymen, A., & Mengüç, A. (2020). Comparative evaluation of different statistical tools for the prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rocks. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 30(6), 785-797.
  10. Jeng, F.S., Lin, M.L., Huang, T.H., & Weng, M.C. (2004). Influence of petrographic parameters on geotechnical behavior of weak sandstone. Engineering Geology, 73(1-2), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2003.12.001
  11. Duda, M. (2013). The weakening effect of water on the brittle failure strength of rocks. Geophysical Journal International, 192(3), 1091-1108. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs090
  12. Schumacher, R., & Mues-Schumacher, U. (1996). The Kızılkaya ignimbrite – An unusual low-aspect-ratio ignimbrite from Cappadocia, central Turkey. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 70(-2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(95)00046-1
  13. Korkanç, M. (2016). Estimation of engineering properties of selected tuffs by petrographic and rock indices. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 120, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.05.008
  14. Zhang, X., Altalbawy, F.M.A., Gasmalla, T.A.S., Al-Khafaji, A.H.D., Iraji, A., Syah, R.B.Y., & Nehdi, M.L. (2023). Performance of statistical and intelligent methods in estimating rock compressive strength. Sustainability, 15(7), 5642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075642
  15. Liu, Z., Li, D., Liu, Y., Yang, B., & Zhang, Z.-X. (2023). Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rock based on lithology using stacking models. Rock Mechanics Bulletin, 2(4), 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rockmb.2023.100081
  16. Asteris, P.G., Karoglo, M., Skentou, M., Vasconcelos, G.D., Mingming, H., Bakoulas, G., & Tsakiridis, P. (2024). Predicting uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using ANN models: Incorporating porosity, compressional wave velocity, and Schmidt hammer data. Ultrasonics, 130, 107347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107347
  17. Ferentinou, M., & Fakir, M. (2017). An ANN approach for the prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of some sedimentary and igneous rocks in Eastern KwaZulu-Natal. Procedia Engineering, 191, 1117-1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.286
  18. Wei, X., Shahani, N.M., & Zheng, X. (2023). Predictive modeling of the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using an artificial neural network approach. Mathematics, 11(7), 1650. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11071650
  19. Wang, M., Wan, W., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks from simple index tests using a random forest predictive model. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 348(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.5802/crmeca.3
  20. Xu, W., Wang, M., Liu, W., Liu, H., Li, H., & Wang, Q. (2024). Comparative study on convolutional neural network and regression analysis to evaluate uniaxial compressive strength of sandy dolomite. Scientific Reports, 14, 9880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60085-8
  21. Zheng, X., Batool, A., Kumar, S., & Shahani, N.M. (2026). Grey Wolf Optimization-optimized ensemble models for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks. Applied Sciences, 16(2), 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021130
  22. Cao, J., Gao, J., Nikfashan Rad, H., Mohammed, A. S., Hasanpanah, M., Zhou, J., & Li, Y. (2022). A novel systematic and evolved approach based on XGBoost-firefly algorithm to predict Young’s modulus and unconfined compressive strength of rock. Engineering with Computers, 38(4), 1657-1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01241-2
  23. Wang, M., Zhao, G., Liang, W., & Wang, N. (2023). A comparative study on the development of hybrid SSA-RF and PSO-RF models for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18, e02191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02191
  24. Li, D., Liu, Z., Armaghani, D.J., Xiao, P., & Zhou, J. (2022). Novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1844. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05844-3
  25. Liu, Z., Jahed Armaghani, D., Fakharian, P., Li, D., & Vladimirovich Ulrich, D. (2022). Rock strength estimation using several tree-based ML techniques. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 133(3), 799-824. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2022.021165
  26. Hassan, M.Y., & Arman, H. (2022). Several machine learning techniques comparison for the prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rocks. Scientific Reports, 12, 20969. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25633-0
  27. Abdelhedi, M., Jabbar, R., Ben Said, A., Fetais, N., & Abbes, C. (2023). Machine learning for prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength within carbonate rocks. Earth Science Informatics, 16(2), 1633-1649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00977-z
  28. Mohamad, E.T., Jahed Armaghani, D., Momeni, E., & Alavi Nezhad Khalil Abad, S.V. (2015). Prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of soft rocks: A PSO-based ANN approach. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 74(3), 745-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0638-0
  29. Wei, M., Meng, W., Dai, F., & Wu, W. (2022). Application of machine learning in predicting the rate-dependent compressive strength of rocks. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14(5), 1356-1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.01.002
  30. Jang, J.S. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665-685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541
  31. Jang, J.S., & Sun, C.T. (1995). Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 83(3), 378-406. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.364486
  32. Al-Hamed, S., Wahby, M., Al-Sulaiman, M., & Aboukarima, A. (2014). Prediction of soil fractions (sand, silt and clay) in the surface layer based on natural radionuclide concentration in the soil using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Open Journal of Soil Science, 4(6), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2014.47024
  33. Cabalar, A.F., Cevik, A., Gokceoglu, C., & Baykal, G. (2010). Neuro-fuzzy based constitutive modeling of undrained response of Leighton Buzzard Sand mixtures. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 842-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.085
  34. Cao, W. (2025). A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 72(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00574-9
  35. Xie, Y., Li, X., & Min, Z. (2025). Comparison of machine learning models for rock UCS prediction using measurement while drilling data. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 3456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93111-4
  36. Ali, M., & Lai, S.H. (2023). Artificial intelligent techniques for prediction of rock strength and deformation properties – A review. Structures, 55, 1542-1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.131
  37. Lawal, A. I., & Kwon, S. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence to rock mechanics: An overview. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 13(1), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.05.010
  38. Horra, H., Hadjadj, A., Saad, E.A., & Brahim, K.M. (2025). 3D rock strength prediction by an innovative approach that integrates geostatistics with machine deep learning models. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 15(7), 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-025-02017-4
  39. Liang, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., & Liu, X. (2024). Analysis of rock mechanical characteristics and establishment of an evaluation system for coal measures in the Longtan Formation, Guizhou Province. ACS Omega, 9(4), 3641-3654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c01643
  40. Mahmoodzadeh, A., Mohammadi, M., Ibrahim, H.H., Abdulhamid, S.N., Salim, S.G., Ali, H.F.H., & Majeed, M.K. (2021). Artificial intelligence forecasting models of uniaxial compressive strength. Transportation Geotechnics, 27, 100499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100499
  41. Kumar, T., Seelam, N.K., & Rao, G.S. (2022). Lithology prediction from well log data using machine learning techniques: A case study from Talcher coalfield, Eastern India. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 199, 104605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104605
  42. Muzamhindo, H., & Ferentinou, M. (2023). Generic compressive strength prediction model applicable to multiple lithologies based on a broad global database. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 71, 103400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103400
  43. Sujatono, S. (2022). Determination of cohesion and friction angle on sedimentary rock based on geophysical log. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 8(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-022-00343-z
  44. Lai, J., Su, Y., Xiao, L., Zhao, F., Bai, T., Li, Y., Li, H., Huang, Y., Wang, G., & Qin, Z. (2024). Application of geophysical well logs in solving geologic issues: Past, present and future prospect. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(3), 101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101779
  45. McNally, G.H. (1987). Estimation of coal measures rock strength using sonic and neutron logs. Geoexploration, 24(4-5), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7142(87)90008-1
  46. McNally, G.H. (1990). The prediction of geotechnical rock properties from sonic and neutron logs. Exploration Geophysics, 21(1-2), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG990065
  47. Saedi, B., Mohammadi, S., Davoud, S., & Hossein, S. (2018). Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of migmatites using various modeling techniques. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11(18), 456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3912-9
  48. Miah, M.I., Ahmed, S., Zendehboudi, S., & Butt, S. (2020). Machine learning approach to model rock strength: Prediction and variable selection with aid of log data. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 53, 4691-4715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02184-2
  49. Zhao, R., Shi, S., Li, S., Guo, W., Zhang, T., Li, X., & Lu, J. (2023). Deep learning for intelligent prediction of rock strength by adopting measurement while drilling data. International Journal of Geomechanics, 23(4), 04023028. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8133
  50. Xie, H., Lin, P., Kang, J., Zhai, C., & Du, Y. (2024). Prediction method of rock uniaxial compressive strength based on feature optimization and SSA-XGBoost. Sustainability, 16(19), 8460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198460
  51. Li, D., Li, X., Liu, L., He, W., Li, Y., & Shi, S. (2025). Prediction on rock strength by mineral composition from machine learning of ECS logs. Energy Geoscience, 6(2), 100386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100386
  52. Goldstein, D., Aldrich, C., Shao, Q., & O’Connor, L. (2025). A machine learning classification approach to geotechnical characterization using measure-while-drilling data. Geosciences, 15(3), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15030093
  53. Balaguera, A., Torné, M., Carbonell, R., Martí, A., Vergés, J., Jurado, M.J., & Rodríguez, S. (2025). Machine learning in subsurface physical properties and lithofacies prediction in a mining context. Scientific Reports, 15, 26495. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11953-4
  54. Sun, Q., Zhao, Y., & Ma, J. (2021). Predicting strength of coal – grout composites using ensemble machine learning methods. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 31(2), 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.09.002
  55. Zhao, J., Li, D., Jiang, J., & Luo, P. (2024). Uniaxial compressive strength prediction for rock material in deep mine using boosting-based machine learning methods and optimization algorithms. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 140(1), 275-304. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.046960
  56. Sujatono, S., & Wijaya, A. E. (2022). The influence of quartz content on modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio in quartz sandstone. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 81(7), 292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02798-6
  57. Sujatono, S. (2022). Empirical analysis of density value based on laboratory test and geophysical log on sedimentary rock. Geomate Journal, 23(98), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.21660/2022.98.3624
  58. Zhang, J., Liu, G., Wei, Z., Li, S., Zayier, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2025). Machine learning-based prediction of well logs guided by rock physics and its interpretation. Sensors, 25(3), 836. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25030836
  59. Akosah, S., Gratchev, I., & Gidigasu, S.S.R. (2025). A systematic literature review on the application of artificial intelligence techniques for rock strength estimation. Neural Computing and Applications, 37, 20721-20753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-025-11517-7
  60. Hussain, J., Fu, X., Chen, J., Ali, N., Tobal, S.M., Swamy, V.S., Kumar, M.B., & Karrar, R.C. (2025). Estimation of rock strength parameters from petrological contents using tree-based machine learning techniques. AI in Civil Engineering, 1(1), 100001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43503-024-00047-1
  61. Alomari, E., Ng, K., & Khatri, L. (2025). Experimental investigation and prediction of mechanical properties of carbonate rocks under uniaxial and triaxial compressions. Materials, 18(6), 1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061211
  62. Лицензия Creative Commons