Mining of Mineral Deposits

ISSN 2415-3443 (Online)

ISSN 2415-3435 (Print)

Flag Counter

A Python‑based modeling enabling lithology‑driven friction factor calibration

Gullu Jabbarova1, Vusal Iskandarov1, Yelena Shmoncheva1

1Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, Baku, Azerbaijan


Min. miner. depos. 2026, 20(2):22-30


https://doi.org/10.33271/mining20.02.022

Full text (PDF)


      ABSTRACT

      Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to develop and validate a Python-based workflow for processing continuous hook-load data and applying it to lithology-driven friction-factor calibration in torque-and-drag analysis during casing-running operations in deep, high-pressure wells.

      Methods. The proposed workflow is based on the automated processing of continuous mud-logging hook-load data recorded during casing deployment. The procedure includes data cleaning, threshold-based segmentation, rolling filtering, outlier removal, and extraction of representative tripping-in and tripping-out load trends. The processed trends are then compared with field measurements and used to calibrate interval-specific friction factors in torque and drag simulations for two offshore wells.

      Findings. The results show that the developed workflow converts noisy continuous hook-load records into stable load trends suitable for calibration. In both analyzed wells, a single constant friction factor was insufficient to reproduce the full mechanical response of the casing run. Better agreement was achieved when friction factors were calibrated for individual depth intervals. The calibrated profiles also showed that changes in friction behavior were generally consistent with lithological transitions and heterogeneous wellbore conditions.

      Originality. The study’s originality lies in combining continuous mud-logging hook-load data, automated Python-based processing, and interval-specific torque- and drag-calibration into a single workflow for lithology-sensitive interpretation of casing-running behavior.

      Practical implications. The proposed approach reduces reliance on manual point selection, improves the consistency of post-run torque-and-drag calibration, and can serve as a practical engineering tool for analyzing casing-running performance in geologically complex wells.

      Keywords: torque and drag analysis; friction factor calibration; casing-running operations; mud-logging data; lithology; Python workflow; wellbore mechanics


      REFERENCES

  1. Johancsik, C.A., Friesen, D.B., & Dawson, R. (1984). Torque and drag in directional wells – prediction and measurement. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 36(6), 987–992. https://doi.org/10.2118/11380-PA
  2. Xie, L., Moran, D., Yan, L., & Mercado, J. (2012). Sophisticated software analysis and the use of torque/drag modeling for complex well operations increase operational efficiency. Proceedings of the SPE Western Regional Meeting, SPE-152056-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/152056-MS
  3. Wu, A., & Hareland, G. (2012). Calculation of friction coefficient and downhole weight on bit with finite element analysis of drillstring. Proceedings of the 46th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, ARMA-2012-195.
  4. Mitchell, R.F., & Samuel, R. (2009). How good is the torque/drag model? SPE Drilling & Completion, 24(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.2118/105068-PA
  5. McCormick, J.E., Frilot, M., & Chiu, T.F. (2011). Torque and drag software model comparison: Impact on application and calibration of field data. Proceedings of the Brasil Offshore Conference, SPE-143623-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/143623-MS
  6. McCormick, J., & Wilcox, D. (2013). A work method to analyzing friction factors in torque and drag modeling. Proceedings of the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, SPE-167172-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167172-MS
  7. Abughaban, M.F., Eustes, A.W., de Wardt, J.P., & Willerth, M. (2017). Improving torque and drag prediction using advanced spline-curve borehole trajectory representation. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, SPE-184611-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/184611-MS
  8. Elgibaly, A.A., Farhat, M.S., Trant, E.W., & Kelany, M. (2017). A study of friction factor model for directional wells. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 26(2), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.07.004
  9. Carpenter, C. (2019). Automated real-time torque-and-drag analysis improves drilling performance. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 71(2), 67–69. https://doi.org/10.2118/0219-0067-JPT
  10. Carpenter, C. (2021). Digital transformation enables automated real-time torque-and-drag modeling. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 73(1), 69–70. https://doi.org/10.2118/0121-0069-JPT
  11. Cherukuri, A., Ismayilov, E., Zeynalov, E., Jabbarov, F., Iskandarov, V., & Karimov, E. (2022). Drilling and cementing to isolate productive series and high-pressure zones: A successful case history enabling zonal isolation in a high-pressure gas well with close PP/FG margins in the South Caspian Basin. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference, SPE-212071-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/212071-MS
  12. Akbarli, E., Ismayilov, E., & Masalmah, M. (2019). The heaviest and longest 13 3/8-in. full-string casing run in the Caspian Sea region. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference, SPE-198348-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/198348-MS
  13. Mirzayev, M., Gasimova, S., & Gasimov, I. (2019). Pore pressure and optimum mud weight estimation using offset wells in Bulla Deniz Field, Azerbaijan: Case study. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference, SPE-198392-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/198392-MS
  14. Sun, K., Mu, C., Yu, T., & Paterson, G. (2023). An innovative workflow for real-time torque and drag monitoring. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, SPE-212535-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/212535-MS
  15. Montes, A.C., Ashok, P., van Oort, E., Leš, B., Mullendore, M., & Limaye, S. (2025). Casing run failure avoidance through automated assessment of borehole quality. SPE Journal, 30(11), 6715–6738. https://doi.org/10.2118/223706-PA
  16. Arevalo, P., Katzmann, L., Wessling, S., & Lanzet, B. (2026). Physics-based and data-driven models: Blending the best of two worlds to enable advanced well protection. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, SPE-230671-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/230671-MS
  17. Лицензия Creative Commons