Mining of Mineral Deposits

ISSN 2415-3443 (Online)

ISSN 2415-3435 (Print)

Flag Counter

Reuse of stone working enterprise slurry in geopolymer and concrete products

Volodymyr Shamrai1, Iryna Leonets1, Viktoriia Melnyk-Shamrai1, Iryna Patseva1, Yaroslav Naumov1

1Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine


Min. miner. depos. 2024, 18(4):10-17


https://doi.org/10.33271/mining18.04.010

Full text (PDF)


      ABSTRACT

      Purpose is to assess influence by fine stone working refuse (FSWR) on physicomechanical characteristics of geopolymer and concrete materials for future development of efficient methods of the FSWR reuse.

      Methods. Geopolymer mixtures and concrete samples differing in FSWR proportions were applied for the research. Mechanical compression testing was performed with the samples, which helped assess influence by different number of FSWR on material strength. Totally, 16 polymer and 18 concrete samples were prepared.

      Findings. The research has analyzed the possibility of FSWR application while manufacturing concrete and geopolymer materials to reuse industrial waste, and mitigate its environmental impact. The research is intended to identify FSWR effect on physicomechanical characteristics of materials, and develop techniques for their reuse. FSWR addition loses geopolymer strength: if content is 25% then strength is 20 MPa; if the content is 50% then strength drops down to 5.3 MPa. As for concrete, partial sand replacement by FSWR decreases strength insignificantly (from 37.42 to 36.6 MPa if FSWR content is 20%). Geopolymers with 25% of FSWR are suitable for low-load structures; in turn, concrete mixtures containing FSWR can be applied without significant strength decrease.

      Originality. . For the first time, optimal fine refuse concentration of strong natural stone from Zhytomyr Region has been identified. The concentration is up to 25%. It provides acceptable compression strength with no significant decrease in technical characteristics.

      Practical implications are as follows. Compliance with optimal FSWR proportions in composition of geopolymer and concrete mixtures makes it possible to reduce cost of raw materials; decrease FSWR amount; and support the closed economy principles in the construction industry.

      Keywords: geopolymers, concrete, fine refuse, stone working, waste utilization, strength


      REFERENCES

  1. Singh, M., Saini, B., & Chalak, H.D. (2021). An overview on utilization of stone waste in construction industry. Processing of the 3rd International Conference on Innovative Technologies for Clean and Sustainable Development: ITCSD, 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51485-3_38
  2. Oyejobi, D.O., Firoozi, A.A., Fernandez, D.B., & Avudaiappan, S. (2024). Integrating circular economy principles into concrete technology: enhancing sustainability through industrial waste utilization. Results in Engineering, 24, 102846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102846
  3. Amin, M., Zeyad, A.M., Agwa, I.S., & Rizk, M.S. (2024). Effect of industrial wastes on the properties of sustainable ultra-high-performance concrete: Ganite, ceramic, and glass. Construction and Building Materials, 428, 136292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136292
  4. Yelemessov, K., Krupnik, L., Bortebayev, S., Beisenov, B., Baskanbayeva, D., & Igbayeva, A. (2020). Polymer concrete and fibre concrete as efficient materials for manufacture of gear cases and pumps. E3S Web of Conferences, 168, 00018. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016800018
  5. Nanda, R.P., & Priya, N. (2024). Geopolymer as stabilising materials in pavement constructions: A review. Cleaner Waste Systems, 7, 100134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100134
  6. Raimbekova, A., Kapralova, V., Popova, A., Kubekova, S., Dalbanbay, A., Kalenova, A., Mustahimov, B., Yermekbayeva, S., & Myrzabekova, S. (2024). Corrosion behavior of mild steel in sodium sulfate solution in presence of phosphates of different composition. Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 59(2), 367-377. https://doi.org/10.59957/jctm.v59.i2.2024.16
  7. Savchenko, A.M., & Tkachenko T.M. (2022). Implementation of European regulations of green building in the construction industry of Ukraine. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 41(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2022.1.31-43
  8. Zuievska, N., Gubashova, V., Korobiichuk, V. (2021). Modeling of the effect of a high-pressure jet of cement mortar on the surrounding soil environment when performing jet grouting columns using jet technology E3S. Web of Conferences, 280, 03001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128003001
  9. Korobiichuk, V., Kravets, V., Sobolevskyi, R., Han, A., & Vapnichna, V. (2018). Weakening of rock strength under the action of cyclic dynamic loads. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(5(92)), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.127847
  10. Shamrai, V., Melnyk-Shamrai, V., Temchenko, A., Makhno, A., & Ihnatiuk, R. (2023). Research on the qualitative properties of stone quarrying and stone processing waste for the purpose of using them as raw materials for the production of geopolymer concrete. Technical Engineering, 1(91), 385-397. https://doi.org/10.26642/ten-2023-1(91)-385-397
  11. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2024). Retrieved from: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
  12. Illankoon, C., & Vithanage, S.C. (2023). Closing the loop in the construction industry: A systematic literature review on the development of circular economy. Journal of Building Engineering, 76, 107362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107362
  13. Chubenko, V., Khinotskaya, A., Yarosh, T., Saithareiev, L., & Baskanbayeva, D. (2022). Investigation of energy-power parameters of thin sheets rolling to improve energy efficiency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1049, 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1049/1/012051
  14. Xu, Y., Liu, S., & Heisel, F. (2024). Towards sustainable construction waste management: Study on a disassemblable brick partition wall for the architecture, construction, and engineering industry. Circular Economy, 3(1), 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2024.100078
  15. Kuandykov, T.A., Karmanov, T.D., Kuldeyev, E.I., Yelemessov, K.K., & Kaliev, B.Z. (2022). New technology of uncover the ore horizon by the method of in-situ leaching for uranium mining. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Series of Geology and Technical Science, 3(453), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.32014/2022.2518-170X.186
  16. Yelemessov, K., Nauryzbayeva, D., Bortebayev, S., Baskanbayeva, D., & Chubenko, V. (2021). Efficiency of application of fiber concrete as a material for manufacturing bodies of centrifugal pumps. E3S Web of Conferences, 280, 07007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128007007
  17. Yelemessov, K.K., Baskanbayeva, D.D., Sabirova, L.B., & Akhmetova, S.D. (2023). Justification of an acceptable modern energy-efficient method of obtaining sodium silicate for production in Kazakhstan. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1254(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1254/1/012002
  18. Rashwan, M., Al-Basiony, T.M., Mashaly, A.O., & Khalil, M.M. (2020). Behaviour of fresh and hardened concrete incorporating marble and granite sludge as cement replacement. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101697
  19. Sadek, D.M., El-Attar, M.M., & Ali, H.A. (2016), Reusing of marble and granite powders in self-compacting concrete for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.044
  20. Mashaly, A.O., Shalaby, B.N., & Rashwan, M.A. (2018). Performance of mortar and concrete incorporating granite sludge as cement replacement. Construction and Building Materials, 169, 800-818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.046
  21. Ghorbani, S., Taji, I., Tavakkolizadeh, M., Davodi, A., & de Brito, J. (2018). Improving corrosion resistance of steel rebars in concrete with marble and granite waste dust as partial cement replacement. Construction and Building Materials, 185, 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.066
  22. Munir, Q., Abdulkareem, M., Horttanainen, M., & Kärki, T. (2023). A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete produced from industrial side streams in comparison with traditional concrete. Science of the Total Environment, 865, 161230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161230
  23. Dobiszewska, M., Bagcal, O., Beycioğlu, A., Goulias, D., Köksal, F., Niedostatkiewicz, M., & Ürünveren, H. (2022). Influence of rock dust additives as fine aggregate replacement on properties of cement composites – A review. Materials, 15(8), 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082947
  24. Gupta, L.K., & Vyas, A.K. (2018). Impact on mechanical properties of cement sand mortar containing waste granite powder. Construction and Building Materials, 191, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.203
  25. Guo, L., Zhao, W., Guo, L., & Wang, Z. (2023). Study on mechanical properties and pore structure characteristics of alkali activation sludge-cement composites. Materials Today Communications, 35, 105469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105469
  26. Terrones-Saeta, J.M., Suárez-Macías, J., Corpas-Iglesias, F.A., Korobiichuk, V., & Shamrai, V. (2020). Development of ceramic materials for the manufacture of bricks with stone cutting sludge from granite, Minerals, 10(7), 62115. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10070621
  27. Korobiichuk, I., Shamray, V., Korobiichuk, V., Kryvoruchko, A., & Iskov, S. (2021). Dose measurement of flocculants in water treatment of stone processing plants. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1390, 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74893-7_34
  28. Salehi, M., Bayat, M., Saadat, M., & Nasri, M. (2021). Experimental study on mechanical properties of cement-stabilized soil blended with crushed stone waste. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(6), 1974-1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0953-5
  29. Лицензия Creative Commons