Mining of Mineral Deposits

ISSN 2415-3443 (Online)

ISSN 2415-3435 (Print)

Flag Counter

Evaluating the wear of cutting tools using a tunnel boring machine laboratory simulator

Hamid Mousapour1, Hamid Chakeri1, Mohammad Darbori1, Amin Hekmatnejad2

1Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran

2Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile


Min. miner. depos. 2023, 17(2):28-34


https://doi.org/10.33271/mining17.02.028

Full text (PDF)


      ABSTRACT

      Purpose. One of the most common problems in mechanized excavation is the cutting tool wear, which has a great impact on the final cost of the project and its duration. Also, one of the most important factors affecting the wear of cutting tools is the operating parameters of the tunnel boring machine (TBM). Within the framework of this research, a tunnel boring machine laboratory simulator was designed and constructed to investigate the tunnel excavation process in the laboratory.

      Methods. A few of the features of this device are that it operates horizontally, has a low rotation speed, keeps the pins in contact with fresh soil throughout the test, and has the possibility of measuring the torque of the device during the test. A study of the cutting tool wear was conducted using granulation prepared from Tabriz metro line 2, as well as using operating parameters of mechanized excavation machines, such as penetration rate and cutter head rotation speed.

      Findings. The research results showed that by reducing the rotation speed of the cutter head from 35 to 10 rpm, the average wear of cutting tools is reduced by 63%. Also, by reducing the excavation time from 80 to 10 minutes, the cutting tool wear is reduced by 58%. The wear of cutting tool increases with increasing moisture content from 0 to 10%, and then decreases with increasing moisture content from 10 to 25%.

      Originality. During this research, a new device was designed and built to simulate tunnel excavation mechanisms. This laboratory simulator measures wear percentage, penetration rate and torque.

      Practical implications. There has been significant progress in predicting soil abrasion rates, but there are few accepted models for predicting cutting tool wear and soil abrasion rates. During the design and construction of the tunnel boring machine laboratory simulator, the effect of operating parameters on wear of cutting tool was examined.

      Keywords: mechanized excavation, cutting tool wear, penetration rate, cutter head rotation speed, torque


      REFERENCES

  1. Avunduk, E. (2018). Investigation of effects of soil conditioning. Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul Technical University.
  2. Rostami, J., Gharahbagh, E.A., Palomino, A.M., & Mosleh, M. (2012). Development of soil abrasivity testing for soft ground tunneling using shield machines. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (28), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.11.007
  3. Düllmann, J., Alber, M., & Plinninger, R.J. (2014). Determining soil abrasiveness by use of index tests versus using intrinsic soil parameters. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 7(1), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201310028
  4. Ko, T.Y., Kim, T.K., Son, Y., & Jeon, S. (2016). Effect of geomechanical properties on Cerchar Abrasivity Index (CAI) and its application to TBM tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (57), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.006
  5. Farrokh, E. (2021). Primary and secondary tools’ life evaluation for soft ground TBMs. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, (80), 4909-4927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02223-4
  6. Amoun, S., Sharifzadeh, M., Shahriar, K., Rostami, J., & Azali, S.T. (2017). Evaluation of tool wear in EPB tunneling of Tehran Metro, Line 7 Expansion. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (61), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.001
  7. Bakar, M.A., Zafar, Z., & Majeed, Y. (2020). Abrasiveness evaluation of selected river gravels of Pakistan using LCPC rock abrasivity test. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, (79), 2561-2577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01719-4
  8. Thuro, K., & Käsling, H. (2009). Classification of the abrasiveness of soil and rock. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, (2), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.200900012
  9. Zhang, X.P., Tang, S.H., Liu, Q.S., Tu, X.B., Chen, P., & Li, F.Y. (2021). An experimental study on cutting tool hardness optimization for shield TBMs during dense fine silty sand ground tunneling. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, (80), 6813-6826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02327-x
  10. Jakobsen, P.D., & Lohne, J. (2013). Challenges of methods and approaches for estimating soil abrasivity in soft ground TBM tunnelling. Wear, 308(1-2), 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.06.022
  11. Rong, X., Lu, H., Wang, M., Wen, Z., & Rong, X. (2019). Cutter wear evaluation from operational parameters in EPB tunneling of Chengdu Metro. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (93), 103043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103043
  12. Avunduk, E., & Copur, H. (2018). Empirical modeling for predicting excavation performance of EPB TBM based on soil properties. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (71), 340-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.016
  13. Azali, S.T., Ghafoori, M., Lashkaripour, G.R., & Hassanpour, J. (2013). Engineering geological investigations of mechanized tunneling in soft ground: A case study, East-West lot of line 7, Tehran Metro, Iran. Engineering Geology, (166), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.07.012
  14. Bakar, M.A., Majeed, Y., & Rostami, J. (2018). Influence of moisture content on the LCPC test results and its implications on tool wear in mechanized tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (81), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.021
  15. Lee, H., Kim, D., Shin, D., Oh J., & Choi, H. (2022). Effect of foam conditioning on performance of EPB shield tunnelling through laboratory excavation test. Transportation Geotechnics, (32), 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100692
  16. Sun, Z., Yang, Z., Jiang, Y., Gao, H., Fang, K., & Yin, M. (2021). Influence of particle size distribution, test time, and moisture content on sandy stratum LCPC abrasivity test results. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, (80), 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01927-3
  17. Küpferle, J., Rottger, A., Thesien, W., & Alber, M. (2016). The RUB tunneling device – A newly developed test method to analyze and determine the wear of excavation tools in soils. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (59), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.06.006
  18. Küpferle, J., Zizka, Z., Schoesser, B., Röttger, A., Alber, M., Thewes, M., & Theisen, W. (2018). Influence of the slurry-stabilized tunnel face on shield TBM tool wear regarding the soil mechanical changes –Experimental evidence of changes in the tribological system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (74), 206-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.011
  19. Tang, S.H., Zhang, X.P., Liu, Q.S., Xie, W.Q., Wang, H.J., Li, X.F., & Zhang, X.Y. (2022). New soil abrasion testing method for evaluating the influence of geological parameters of abrasive sandy ground on scraper wear in TBM tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (128), 104604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104604
  20. Lan, H., Xia, Y., Miao, B., Fu, J., & Ji, Z. (2020). Prediction model of wear rate of inner disc cutter of engineering in Yinsong, Jilin. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (99), 103338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103338
  21. Peila, D., Picchio, A., Martinelli, D., & Negro, E.D. (2016). Laboratory tests on soil conditioning of clayey soil. Acta Geotechnica, 11(5), 1061-1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0406-8
  22. Plinninger, R., Käsling, H., Thuro, K., & Spaun, G. (2003). Testing conditions and geomechanical properties influencing the CERCHAR abrasiveness index (CAI) value. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, (40), 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00140-5
  23. ASTM D422-63. (2007). Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. West Conshohocken, United States: ASTM International.
  24. Лицензия Creative Commons