Mining of Mineral Deposits

ISSN 2415-3443 (Online)

ISSN 2415-3435 (Print)

Flag Counter

Early assessment of seismic hazard in terms of Voronezh massif-Moscow Depression contact

Igor Movchan1, Alexandra Yakovleva1, Alexander Movchan2, Zilya Shaygallyamova1

1Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, 199106, Russian Federation

2University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, United Kingdom


Min. miner. depos. 2021, 15(3):62-70


https://doi.org/10.33271/mining15.03.062

Full text (PDF)


      ABSTRACT

      Purpose is to develop a system approach for early assessment of areas being of high seismic hazard and characterizing by low stability of rock mass relative to external loads.

      Methods. Well cores have been assessed down to 30 depth and seismic observations have been accumulated. Complexes of field geophysics methods have been applied for the research as well as remote sensing materials, digital model of surface relief, and techniques of qualitative and quantitative interpretation.

      Findings. Seismic hazard map has been formed in terms of seismic intensification and ground displacement units. The abovementioned is quite reliable but a cost-based result involving early assessments of high seismic hazard areas to infill network of geophysical measurements in the neighbourhood of the areas for their further quantitative characterization. It has been identified that rare well network and definite geophysical lines, run under conditions of a complex terrain, cannot localize the areas of high seismic hazard to focus builders on the enforcement of certain components of the erected structures. It has been defined that end result of the prognostic developments takes a shape of mapping of local areas with the decreased stability of upper share of the geological section supported by further measurements by means of a common depth point method (CDP). Comparison of potential secondary earthquake sources with high permeability zones makes it possible to predict highly reliable areas of the increased seismic magnitude.

      Originality.For the first time, interpretation techniques have been adapted to describe parametrically nonpotential geofields (i.e. optical density of remote basis; and relative elevation), accepted during the steps of potential field processing, with the use of wave analogies.

      Practical implications.The methods have been developed helping optimize field geological and geophysical operations in terms of area and well number as well as measuring stakes under the conditions of the limited prior data amount.

      Keywords:jointing, seismic zoning, terrain, karst, digital model, interpretation


      REFERENCES

  1. Eppelbaum, L.V. (2007). Localization of ring structures in Earth’s environment. Journal of Archaeological Science of the Slovakian Academy of Sciences, (XLI), 145-148.
  2. Koronovsky, N.V., Bryantseva, G.V., Goncharov, M.A., Naimark, A.A., & Kopaev, A.V. (2014). Lineaments, planetary jointing, and the regmatic system: Main points of the phenomena and terminology. Geotectonics, (48), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852114020058
  3. Putikov, O.F., & Senchina, N.P. (2015). Precise solution of the system of nonlinear differential equations in partial derivatives of the theory of geoelectrochemical methods. Doklady Earth Sciences, 463(1), 726-727. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X15070132
  4. Ulomov, V.I., & Bogdanov, M.I. (2007). On the software and mathematical support for development of the maps of probabilistic seismic zoning according to OSR-97 technique. Geophysical Research: Collection of Scientific Papers of the Institute of Physics of the Earth RAS, (7), 29-52.
  5. Giardini, D., Gruenthal, G., Shedlock, K., & Zhang, P. (2003). The GSHAP global seismic hazard map. International Journal of Geophysics, 81(B), 1239-1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0074-6142(03)80188-2
  6. Gospodarikov, A.P., & Chi, T.N. (2019). The impact of earthquakes on the tunnel from Hanoi metro system when the tunnel has a horseshoe shape cross-section. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(02), 79-86.
  7. Kheraskova, T.N., Andreeva, N.K., Vorontsov, A.K., & Kagramanyan N.A. (2005). Evolution of Moscow sedimentary basin in early Paleozoic. Lithology and Mineral Resources, 40(2), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10987-005-0016-x
  8. Sokolov, E.M., Dmitrakov, A.V., Simakin, A.F., & Reshetov, V.V. (2000). Geoecology of the economic complex of Tula and its region. Tula, Russia Federation: Tula State University.
  9. Danilev, S.M., & Danileva, N.A. (2018). Characteristics electromagnetic waves of GPR data for study of hidden cavities in the engineering objects. Proceedings of the 14th Conference and Exhibition on Engineering and Mining Geophysics 2018, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201800540
  10. Danilev, S.M., & Danileva, N.A. (2019). Perspective electrical exploration the dams of gypsum accumulator in the framework for geotechnical monitoring. Proceedings of the 15th Conference and Exhibition on Engineering and Mining Geophysics 2019, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901716
  11. Ostrovskaya, E.V. (2002). Some problems of ecology of natural waters of Novomoskovsk district of Tula region. Journal of Mining Institute, (152), 9-41.
  12. Clifford, F.D., & Williams, P. (2007). Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. New York, United State: John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118684986
  13. Afanasiadi, E.I., Gryaznov, O.N., Dubeykovsky, S.G., & Neshetkin, O.B. (2003). Limestone karst of the East Ural Region. Journal of Mining Institute, (153), 46-50.
  14. Pashkevich, M.A., & Petrova, T.A. (2019). Development of an operational environmental monitoring system for hazardous industrial facilities of Gazprom Dobycha Urengoy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (1384), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1384/1/012040
  15. Egorov, A.S., Vinokurov, I.Y., Belevskaya, E.S., & Kalenich, A.P. (2016). Deep structure of the Barents-Kara region according to geophysical investigations along 1-AR and 2-AR geotravers. Proceedings of the 7th Eage Saint Petersburg International Conference and Exhibition “Understanding the Harmony of the Earth’s Resources through Integration of Geosciences”, 728-732. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201600173
  16. Rakhil, K.R., Kishan, D., & Sarup, J. (2015). Lineament extraction and lineament density assessment of Omkareshwar M.P., India, using GIS Techniques. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 5(3), 717-720. https://doi.org/10.30536/j.ijreses.2016.v13.a2704
  17. Yakovleva, A.A., Movchan, I.B., Misseroni, D., Pugno, N.M., & Movchan, A.B. (2021). Multi-physics of dynamic elastic metamaterials and earthquake systems. Frontiers in Materials, (7), 489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.620701
  18. Gupta, R.P. (2003). Remote sensing: Geology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05283-9
  19. Nugroho, U.C., & Tjahjaningsih, A. (2016). Lineament density information extraction using DEM SRTM data to predict the mineral potential zones. International Journal of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, 13(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.30536/j.ijreses.2016.v13.a2704
  20. Kennelly, P.J. (2008). Terrain maps displaying hill-shading with curvature. Geomorphology, 102(3-4), 567-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.05.046
  21. Dahlhaus, R., Kurths, J., Maass, P., & Timmer, J. (2021). Mathematical methods in time series analysis and digital image processing. Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75632-3
  22. Nunez, I., & Ferrari, J.A. (2007). Differential operator approach for Fourier image processing. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 24(8), 2274-2279. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.002274
  23. Singhroy, V.H., & Pilkington, M. (2014). Geological mapping using Earth’s magnetic field. Encyclopedia of Remote Sensing, 232-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36699-9_38
  24. Grazzini, J., Turiel, A., & Yahia, H. (2002). Entropy estimation and multiscale processing in meteorological satellite images. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, (3). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2002.1048103
  25. Muhammad, E.M.N., Muhammad, S.S., Arif, H., Wildan, N.H., Benyamin, S., Mirzam, A., & Alfend, R. (2020). Automatic and manual fracture-lineament identification on digital surface models as methods for collecting fracture data on outcrops: case study on fractured granite outcrops, Bangka. Journal of Frontiers in Southeast Asian Geosciences, (17). https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.560596
  26. Petrov, O.V. (2019). The Earth’s dissipative structures: Fundamental wave properties of substance. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93614-7_6
  27. Petrov, O.V. (2021). The Earth’s free oscillations. Springer. Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67517-2
  28. Petrakov, D.G., Kupavykh, K., & Kupavykh, A. (2020). The effect of fluid saturation on the elastic-plastic properties of oil reservoir rocks. Curved and Layered Structures, (7), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1515/cls-2020-0003
  29. Ribe, N.M. (2001). Bending and stretching of thin viscous sheets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, (433), 135-160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112000003360
  30. Aleksanova, E., Varentsov, I.M., Vereshchagina, M., & Kulikov, V.A. (2010). Electormagnetic sounding of the sedimentary cover and consolidated crust in the transition zone from the Moscow Syneclise to the Voronezh Anteclise: Problems and prospects. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 46(8), 707-716. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351310080070
  31. Mulchrone, K.F., & Talbot, Ch.J. (2014). Constraining the strain ellipsoid and deformation parameters using deformed single layers: A computational approach assuming pure shear and isotropic volume change. Journal of Structural Geology, (52), 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.02.002
  32. Volkov, K.Yu. (1965). Schematic map of roof relief of crystalline basement of Moscow syneclise and Ryazan-Saratov trough. Moscow, Russian Federation: GURTs.
  33. Mazurov, B.T., Mustafin, M.G., & Panzhin, A.A. (2019). Estimation method for vector field divergence of Earth crust deformations in the process of mineral deposits development. Journal of Mining Institute, 238(4), 376-383. https://doi.org/10.31897/pmi.2019.4.376
  34. Gorelik, G.D., Budanov, L.M., Ryabchuk, D., Zhamoida, V., & Neevin, I. (2019). Application of CDP seismic reflection method in buried paleo-valley study. Proceedings of the 15th Conference and Exhibition on Engineering and Mining Geophysics 2019, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901777
  35. Sloan, S.D., Tsoflias, G.P., & Steeples, D.W. (2010). Ultra-shallow seismic imaging of the top of the saturated zone. Geophysical Research Letters, 37(7), L07405. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043034
  36. Lalomov, D., Glazunov, V., Tatarskiy, A., Burlutsky, S., & Efimova, N. (2019). Methodical features of studying the geological structure of the coastal part of the sea of Okhotsk based on the integration of continuous aquatic electrical sounding and seismoacoustics data. Proceedings of the 25th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Held at Near Surface Geoscience Conference and Exhibition 2019, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201903466
  37. Movchan, I.B., & Yakovleva, A.A. (2020). Wave analogies in the quantitative interpretation of potential fields. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(2), 1793-1799. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/136922020

    38. Лицензия Creative Commons

Copyright © 2024 Dnipro University of Technology

Underground Mining Department

All Rights Reserved.

Journal homepage Authors