Mining of Mineral Deposits

ISSN 2415-3443 (Online)

ISSN 2415-3435 (Print)

Flag Counter

Exploration and Mining Evaluation System and Price Prediction of Uranium Resources

J. Chen1, Y. Zhao1, Q. Song1, Z. Zhou1, S. Yang1

1Central South University, Changsha, China

Min. miner. depos. 2018, 12(1):85-94

Full text (PDF)


      Purpose. The paper introduces the development of the Uranium Resources Technical and Economic Evaluation Expert System (URTEEES) from the viewpoint of requirement analysis, system design, functional structure and application etc.

      Methods. The system is based on C/B/S mixed mode and applies ASP.NET technology with .Net Framework being selected as the development platform as well as the uranium resources database providing data support at the bottom layer. The paper also proves the efficiency of the system in the context of certain case studies.

      Findings. Since the system can performs the functions of scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis, shareholder’s returns analysis, horizontal comparison of different projects, it can improve the ability of project senior decision-makers for rapid response to the rivals and meet the demand of pricing negotiations. Moreover, the system demonstrates its efficiency in the context of case studies as the system incorporates a number of advanced methods, e.g. the Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization (QPSO) Back Propagation (BP) QPSO-BP model which can improve the generalization ability of BP network to predict the uranium price.

      Originality. Technical and economic evaluation model can be set up by users independently according to the current stage of a project (mainly, these are exploration stage, development stage and production stage) as well as according to the selected mining method (e.g. underground mining, surface mining, or in-situ leaching mining). Then, the technical and economic evaluation parameters can be generated. By means of inputting the value of each parameter in a simple and convenient way, the evaluation results can be calculated directly and shown in the form of diagrams; moreover, feasibility evaluation report can be generated automatically, making the process of technical and economic evaluation accurate and efficient.

      Practical implications. URTEEES performs the functions of decision-making analysis, metal resources database management, data management, comprehensive query etc. The system is a good basis for further development of other expert systems.

      Keywords: uranium resources, expert system, C/B/S mixed mode, quantum particle swarm optimization, algorithm, QPSO-BP model


Castellanos, V., Albiter, A., Hernández, P., & Barrera, G. (2011). Failure Analysis Expert System for Onshore Pipelines. Part – I: Structured Database and Knowledge Acquisition. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11085-11090.

Ebersbach, S., & Peng, Z. (2008). Expert System Development for Vibration Analysis in Machine Condition Monitoring. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 291-299.

Ertl, L., & Christ, F. (2007). Significant Improvement of the Quality of Bystander First Aid Using an Expert System with a Mobile Multimedia Device. Resuscitation, 74(2), 286-295.

Gong, Z., John, D., & Gong, T. (2014). Advanced Expert Systems: Principles, Design and Applications. Beijing, China: Science Press.

Iqbal, A., He, N., Li, L., & Dar, N. (2007). A Fuzzy Expert System for Optimizing Parameters and Predicting Performance Measures in Hard-Milling Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1020-1027.

Kim, K.-S., Roh, M.-I., & Ha, S. (2015). Expert System Based on the Arrangement Evaluation Model for the Arrangement Design of a Submarine. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(22), 8731-8744.

Koutsantonis, D., & Panayiotopoulos, J.-C. (2009). Expert System Personalized Knowledge Retrieval. Operational Research, 11(2), 215-227.

Marlow, D., Gould, S., & Lane, B. (2015). An Expert System for Assessing the Technical and Economic Risk of Pipe Rehabilitation Options. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(22), 8658-8668.

Piltan, M., Mehmanchi, E., & Ghaderi, S.F. (2012). Proposing a Decision-Making Model Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Expert System for Prioritizing Industries in Installation of Combined Heat and Power Systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 1124-1133.

Polat, K., & Güneş, S. (2007). An Expert System Approach Based on Principal Component Analysis and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System to Diagnosis of Diabetes Disease. Digital Signal Processing, 17(4), 702-710.

Ruiz-Mezcua, B., Garcia-Crespo, A., Lopez-Cuadrado, J.L., & Gonzalez-Carrasco, I. (2011). An Expert System Development Tool for Non AI Experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 597-609.

Šubelj, L., Furlan, Š., & Bajec, M. (2011). An Expert System for Detecting Automobile Insurance Fraud Using Social Network Analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 1039-1052.

Wan, S., Lei, T.-C., & Chou, T.-Y. (2012). A Landslide Expert System: Image Classification Through Integration of Data Mining Approaches for Multi-Category Analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(4), 747-770.

Wen, W. (2008). A Dynamic and Automatic Traffic Light Control Expert System for Solving the Road Congestion Problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2370-2381.

Wen, W. (2010). An Intelligent Traffic Management Expert System with RFID Technology. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3024-3035.

Zarandi, M.H.F., & Ahmadpour, P. (2009). Fuzzy Agent-Based Expert System for Steel Making Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 9539-9547.

Лицензия Creative Commons