Evaluation of some renewable energy technologies

R. Basu^1,2

¹Mechanical Engineering Department, Adarsha Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India

²Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, India

Min. miner. depos. 2017, 11(4):29-37

https://doi.org/10.15407/mining11.04.029

Full text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Purpose. The study aims to outline and compare various renewable energy alternatives in view of the global warming crisis and depletion of fossil fuels which cause emissions of carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is a major source of pollution and is an absorbent for radiation.

Methods. Literature surveys and analysis of benefits and drawbacks of the competing technologies should include the capital costs, running costs and carbon footprint. Liquid fuels have high energy to weight ratio compare to say solar panels or thermal absorbers, but what is neglected is the large refinery and other processing machinery behind the liquid fuel which is adding to the carbon footprint.

Findings. Producer gas and bacterial engines are suggested as possible pollution reducing and cost effective methods for power generation. Coal, biomass, geothermal and hydroelectric have the lowest running cost, but carbon footprint cost is neglected. Solar chimneys, with low mechanical efficiency have low running costs, and no pollution. Modification of internal combustion engines to use producer gas and alcohol may reduce overall carbon footprint.

Originality. Many researches focus on energy and mechanical efficiency. Bacterial engines have yet to be fully developed, and these are wonderful chemical factories but not understood in terms of classical thermodynamics. For all technologies, return on investment is more appropriate since capital costs are also included, which are neglected in mechanical efficiency calculations.

Practical implications.Depletion of forest cover which acts as a greenhouse gas sink contributes to global warming. Worldwide, million of cars with internal combustion engines consuming petroleum, if converted to alternative fuels, can help in reducing the carbon gas emissions and ultimately to a slowdown in the global warming rate.

Keywords: producer gas, biogas, global warming, carbon footprint, efficiency

REFERENCES

Al-Dabbas, A. (2011). A Performance Analysis of Solar Chimney Thermal Power Systems. Thermal Science, 15(3), 619-642.
https://doi.org/10.2298/tsci101110017a

Armstrong, D.W., & Martin, S.M. (1983). Bacterial Fermentation of Cellulose: Effect of Physical and Chemical Parameters. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 25(11), 2567-2575.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260251107

Bensah, E.C., & Brew-Hammond, V. (2008). Biogas Effluent and Food Production in Ghana. In National Conference of Ghana Society of Agricultural Engineering. Kumasi, Ghana: GSAE.

Bourzac, K. (2010). Bacteria Make Diesel from Biomass, pp. 1. Retrieved from
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/417263/bacteria-make-diesel-from-biomass/

Campen, B., Guidi, D., & Best, G. (2000). Solar Photovoltaics Energy for Sustainable Agricultural and Power Development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Carey, J. (2012). Is Global Warming Happening Faster Than Expected? Scientific American, pp. 22. Retrieved from
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-global-warming-happening-faster-than-expected/

Christos, D. (2010). Floating Solar Chimney Technology. Solar Energy. Croatia: INTECH.
https://doi.org/10.5772/8069

De Laat, A.T.J., de Gouw, J.A., Lelieveld, J., & Hansel, A. (2001). Model Analysis of Trace Gas Measurements and Pollution Impact during INDOEX. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D22), 28469-28480.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900821

Ethanol Fermentation. (2017). Retrieved from
https://en.wiki-pedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fermentation

Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914

Mackaluso, J.D. (2007). The Use of Syngas Derived from Biomass and Waste Products to Produce Ethanol and Hydrogen. Basic Biotechnology Journal, (3), 98-103.

Mahin, D.B. (1983). Bioenergy from Crop Residues. Washington: BST, Office of Energy.

Nagel, F.P. (2008). Electricity from Wood through the Combination of Gasification and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Systems Analysis and Proof-of-Concept. Doctoral Thesis. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.

Najafpour, G., Younesi, H., & Mohamed, A.R. (2004). Effect of Organic Substrate on Hydrogen Production from Synthesis Gas using Rhodospirillum Rubrum, in Batch Culture. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 21(2), 123-130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2004.06.001

Pavlus, J. (2010). A Wandering, Plant-Eating Robot. Scientific American, pp. 21. Retrieved from
https://www.scientific-american.com/article/a-wandering-plant-eating-robot/

Reppas, N.B., & Ridley, C.P. (2010). Methods and Compositions for the Recombinant Biosynthesis of n-Alkanes. Patent No. 7794969, United States.

Rossum, G., Nanou, P., Swaaij, W., & Kersten, S. (2013). BioEnergy IV: Innovations in Biomass Conversion for Heat, Power, Fuels and Chemicals. Enschede: University of Twente.

Santos Bernardes, M.A. (2010). Solar Chimney Power Plants – Developments and Advancements. Solar Energy. Croatia: INTECH.
https://doi.org/10.5772/8068

Senthilkumar, V., & Gunasekaran, P. (2005). Bioethanol Production from Cellulosic Substrates: Engineered Bacteria and Process Integration Challenges. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 64(11), 845-853.

Sridhar, G., Sridhar, H.V., Dasappa, S., Paul, P.J., Rajan, N.K.S., & Mukunda, H.S. (2005). Development of Producer Gas Engines. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 219(3), 423-438.
https://doi.org/10.1243/095440705x6596

The Bioenergy Technologies Office: Advancing a Thriving and Sustainable Bioeconomy Fueled by Innovative Technologies. (2017). Retrieved from
https://energy.gov/bioenergy

Uihlein, A., & Magagna, D. (2016). Wave and Tidal Current Energy – A Review of the Current State of Research Beyond Technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (58), 1070-1081.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.284

Wald, M. (2010). Gas from Trash. Scientific American, pp. 24. Retrieved from
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gas-from-trash/

Wood Gas as Engine Fuel. (1986). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Younesi, H., Najafpour, G., Ku Ismail, K.S., Mohamed, A. R., & Kamaruddin, A.H. (2008). Biohydrogen Production in a Continuous Stirred Tank Bioreactor from Synthesis Gas by Anaerobic Photosynthetic Bacterium: Rhodopirillum Rubrum. Bioresource Technology, 99(7), 2612-2619.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.059